schedule
January 13, 2006 at 12:00 AM
sweet story. update, update, update!!!
schedule
January 13, 2006 at 12:00 AM
+1 for susan, patils, tonks. -1 for Narcissa
schedule
January 13, 2006 at 12:00 AM
great update it just gets better and better i say padma and im still a big saprter of tonks see is gat a lot going for her with her shapshifting and harry can like her and use her power
schedule
January 13, 2006 at 12:00 AM
Is there a chance of a Dudley/Dementor/Draco triangle?
schedule
January 13, 2006 at 12:00 AM
Hannah, Susan, Blaise, Narcissa, Tonks, Daphne, Another Veela sounds cool, so would a vampire @_@ hmm and a muggle girl that dud likes? >_> pure torture ^_^ LOVE IT
schedule
January 13, 2006 at 12:00 AM
Su Li
Tracy Davis
Blaise (fem)
Tonks
Tracy Davis
Blaise (fem)
Tonks
schedule
January 13, 2006 at 12:00 AM
Very interesting, and given his species has changed, his mindset changing is logical enough...afterall, Fleur was -raping- him, to be specific, raping and enslaving him, there in the Veela segment of the Astral Plane, and thought nothing wrong.
Harry should probably not go that far (ie: thinking actual rape/enslavement is a good and wonderous thing to inflict on people) but being more inclined towards such things fits his new species, especially if used in moderation.
As for Harem...hmm...I would put a vote in for a Slytherin girl, possibly Daphne but one of the others would do (although either non-evil or willing to change is a must)...also, I would nominate Ginny just on general "liked the couple" principals.
As for the "list": +1 Tonks, +1 P/P Twins, -1 Narcissa.
Harry should probably not go that far (ie: thinking actual rape/enslavement is a good and wonderous thing to inflict on people) but being more inclined towards such things fits his new species, especially if used in moderation.
As for Harem...hmm...I would put a vote in for a Slytherin girl, possibly Daphne but one of the others would do (although either non-evil or willing to change is a must)...also, I would nominate Ginny just on general "liked the couple" principals.
As for the "list": +1 Tonks, +1 P/P Twins, -1 Narcissa.
schedule
January 11, 2006 at 12:00 AM
Jarno - True, genetics is inheriently about the probablity of most likely outcome, but specific gene dominance is very different from a theory of superdominance or eugenics, which when taken to extreme equates to being a specific means of breeding a superior race of people.
Glad to know you like it so far. I know it's pretty light for an NC-17 but this isn't a smut and I had a lot of plot stuff I needed to slug through.
Glad to know you like it so far. I know it's pretty light for an NC-17 but this isn't a smut and I had a lot of plot stuff I needed to slug through.
schedule
January 11, 2006 at 12:00 AM
Nice story, really nice. I do believe gene dominance exist. Say a blue eyed and a brown eyed get a child then that child will have a much bigger chance at having brown eyes because that is dominant.
As to other girls well deffinetly add in parvati and padma =>twins.
As to other girls well deffinetly add in parvati and padma =>twins.
schedule
January 11, 2006 at 12:00 AM
Gabrielle +1
Parvati
Padma
Lavender
Susan
Cho
Su Li
Tracy Davis
Blaise (fem)
Pansy +1
Tonks +1
Narcissa +1
Bellatrix add
Parvati
Padma
Lavender
Susan
Cho
Su Li
Tracy Davis
Blaise (fem)
Pansy +1
Tonks +1
Narcissa +1
Bellatrix add