rate_review Reviews

and its another FIC!!! lol.. love it.. especially when harry was ranting on about his mother..a dn the fates..lol.. but i love it.. i plan on following this story to see how it develops

I love it when Mione cheerfully insults Harry\'s Malfoy mate! One of my favorite fanfic traits! I so hope that Ron doesn\'t go all idiont and ruin his friendship with Harry! Thanks so much for the update, and I can\'t wait for the next one!!!!!!

That word was supposed to be idiot, sorry.

ooh I am loving this so far!

So, I\'m guessing Narcissa died sometime in the past? What will Ron and Hermione do with Harry going to Malfoy Manor?
Will Severus have anything to do with the high-jinks that will go on; namely, will he try to upset the soul bonds?

hey you did a new harry/lucius harry/draco! yay! i was sad when you made hybrid destiny just harry/draco. but this makes up for it! not that i dont still love hybrid destiny- please continue with that one! but this one rocks too!
~moi

well ron should just get over his hatred! the malfoys are hot and he is not!
Anyways, Amy, GREAT CHAPPIE! however, I had 1 complaint: ME WANT MORE
HP/DM/LM INTERACTION!!
*sad teary face*
Yes, I am a spoiled brat, thank you very much!
I love this story! Please please please PLEASE update soon!
I\'ll love you more for it...:)
You\'re really good at updates. keep it up!!

It was just a pouty kiss, and I\'m STILL all giggly!! The cat that\'s sitting on my keyboard (his name\'s Clayton) thinks I\'m quite crazy, but this fic is marvelous! Thanks for updating and I can\'t wait for the next one! (but don\'t drive yourself crazy-update in your time not ours)

Aristotle, following Plato, defined the soul as the core essence of a being, but argued against it having a separate existence. For instance, if a knife had a soul, the act of cutting would be that soul, because \'cutting\' is the essence of what it is to be a knife. Unlike Plato and the religious traditions, Aristotle did not consider the soul as some kind of separate, ghostly occupant of the body (just as we cannot separate the activity of cutting from the knife). As the soul, in Aristotle\'s view, is an activity of the body it cannot be immortal (when a knife is destroyed, the cutting stops). More precisely, the soul is the \"first activity\" of a living body. This is a state, or a potential for actual, or \'second\', activity. \"The axe has an edge for cutting\" was, for Aristotle, analogous to \"humans have bodies for rational activity,\" and the potential for rational activity thus constituted the essence of a human soul. Aristotle used his concept of the soul in many of his works; the Nicomachean Ethics provides a good place to start to gain more understanding of his views.

Aristotle\'s view appears to have some similarity to the Buddhist \'no soul\' view (see below). For both there is certainly no \'separable immortal essence\'. It may simply become a matter of definition, as most Buddhists would agree, surely, that one can use a knife for cutting. They might, perhaps, stress the impermanence of the knife\'s cutting ability, and Aristotle would probably agree with that.

...

According to Buddhist teaching, all things are impermanent, in a constant state of flux, all is transient, and no abiding state exists. This applies to humanity as much as to anything else in the cosmos; thus, there is no unchanging and abiding self. Our sense of \"I\" or \"me\" is simply a sense belonging to the ever-changing entity that (conventionally speaking) is us, our body, and mind. This expresses in essence the Buddhist principle of anatta (Pāli; Sanskrit: anātman).
from: Wikipedia on-line encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soul

please update soon...i must know what happens next!!!